Submission will open soon.

Submission deadlines


XX/XX/2026 | Call for submissions closed

XX/XX/2026 | Call for open papers, 3 minute talks & posters closed

XX/XX/2026 | Late poster submission closes

Background

Submissions are invited that fall within the different congress streams, and fit within the range of submission formats.

The congress will run with a semi-hybrid format. That is, participants can attend either in person or online. However, presentations given by participants attending online can only take place in the form of pre-recorded videos or electronic (online-only) posters, and are limited to certain submission formats (see below for details). Approximately one-third of the congress content will be streamed for online viewing, including all keynotes and other sessions taking place in the keynote rooms. All other content will only be accessible in person. Streamed content will also be available for viewing online for approximately 3 months after the congress.

Please read the information below and then make a submission

    • Procedure

When preparing your submission, please ensure you are aware of the deadlines above, which are different depending on submission type. Before making your submission, please read the descriptions of the different submission formats below. Examples are also provided for guidance.

All submissions will be peer reviewed by the 2025 Congress Scientific Committee (the BABCP National Conference Programme Advisory Group and EABCT 2025 European Scientific Committee) after the relevant submission deadline has passed. We therefore expect to be able to let you know the outcome of your submission 4-6 weeks afterwards. If you have deadlines for e.g. funding or visas that do not fit with this timing, please let us know. Please do not email for an outcome on your submission unless it is at least four weeks after the submission deadline.

Each submission can be submitted only once, and the same content cannot be submitted in different formats or across different streams. For all types of submission please identify which stream you consider the submission to be most suitable for, using the relevant drop-down menu. Please note that the Scientific Committee reserves the right to transfer successful submissions into streams and formats other than that proposed in the submission, and schedule for presentation at any point throughout the three-day congress. Submitting your material through the portal will be taken as acceptance of these conditions.

The congress server will automatically acknowledge submissions made through the portal. If you do not receive a copy and acknowledgement of your submission, please check your email junk/spam folder to make sure it has not been diverted to this, prior to contacting us.

    • Registration

Please note that all presenters must register and pay the congress registration fee in advance in order to present at the congress and have their contribution included in the congress programme. For participants who are attending and presenting in person, this means either i) attending the whole congress and paying the registration fee for the whole congress, or ii) attending just for the one day on which they are presenting and paying the registration fee for that day only. For participants who are attending online, presentations can only be delivered via pre-recorded video presentations (i.e. no live remote presentations), and these contributors must pay the online registration free.

    1. Invited Addresses and Invited Pre Congress Workshops

    Only by formal invitation from the 2025 Congress Scientific Committee

      2. Clinical and Research Symposia

      About the format:

      Symposia include multiple presentations, typically 4 or 5, focusing on a specific clinical or research area. Some talks may be very data-focused, centred on new studies and/or trials and their outcomes, others may be more applied, looking at service or clinical skills-related subjects. However there is an expectation that clinical or service-related presentations are empirically or theoretically grounded, and include an evaluative component.

      Speakers may range from presenters at an early stage in their careers presenting their own work to leaders in the world of CBT. Talks from experts by experience are also strongly encouraged. The overall aim of a symposium is to provide a coherent and complementary set of talks that, via the depth or the breadth of what is covered, add up to more than the sum of the individual presentations. Typically, there is time for questions from the audience either after each talk or at the end of the session.

      Generally, symposia will consist of a convenor and chair (which will normally be the same person, but do not have to be), individual presenters, and potentially a discussant (optional) at the end to draw together the main themes covered. Symposia will usually be scheduled for sessions of either 60 or 90 minutes dependent on the schedule of talks.,. There should be a maximum of 5 speakers per symposium (including discussant).

      Submission instructions:

      To ensure we receive adequate information, all submitted symposia should have a symposium abstract of maximum 500 words. This should be a general description of the overall symposium, including the names of at least 3 presenters. We recommend providing a short summary of what each speaker will present: The more specific details you can provide about what will be presented, the easier it is for the submission to be rated; submissions that lack coherence or are vague are difficult to rate very positively and thus at higher risk of rejection.

      However, at the submission stage, we do not require the individual abstracts for each speaker. These will be requested if the submission is accepted, and these individual abstracts will then be what will appear in the congress programme – the overall symposium abstract is only used for rating purposes and not published. If the symposium includes published studies or studies for which there is information publicly available such as a pre-registration or protocol it can be very helpful to include links to these in the abstract to help demonstrate the quality of the submission.

      The name and contact details of the symposium convenor/organiser must be provided. This individual accepts responsibility for ensuring that all speakers provide individual abstracts, when requested. They must also ensure that speakers register to attend the congress (including congress fee) and when required communicate practical information to the Scientific Committee as well as to individual speakers in the symposium.

       

      Please click here for an example of a clinical symposium abstract

      EXAMPLE OF A CLINICAL SYMPOSIUM

      Body image in Eating Disorders: Assessment and Treatment

      Convenor: Tuschen-Caffier, B University of Bielefeld, Germany

      Dissatisfaction with body weight and shape is typical for patients with eating disorders. However, it is still unknown, how patients with eating disorders experience their body in their everyday life and what kind of treatment may enhance body dissatisfaction. Especially, it is unknown, what kind of beliefs may maintain body checking behavior or the avoidance of self-exposure to mirrors. Furthermore, it is an open question whether body dissatisfaction requires a specific intervention and which techniques may be most effective in the treatment of body dissatisfaction. Therefore, the symposium will focus on the following themes: The first presentation (Mountford) will be about the relationship between body checking behaviors and related beliefs in eating-disordered as well as healthy women. Data on psychometric characteristics based on a new measure of cognitions regarding body checking behaviours (using an established measure) will be analysed. The second presenter (Probst) will talk about the mirror behaviour of patients with eating disorders. Furthermore, the presentation will give an insight into the body experience of patients who do and those who do not avoid mirrors. Concerning the treatment of dissatisfaction with body shape and weight exposure techniques have recently been included in treatment programs. However, previous research cannot answer the question if body exposure is more efficient than other interventions. Thus, the following two presentations are addressed to this research theme: One presentation ( Wilson) will be about guided mirror exposure with a mindfulness-based rationale compared to a credible, nondirective treatment intervention. The other presentation (Tuschen-Caffier) will be about mirror exposure compared to cognitive interventions and a waiting-list condition. The primary aim of the last talk (Shafran) is to determine the influence of body size estimation on the immediate and longer-term outcome of patients with eating disorders treated with cognitive-behavioural therapy.

      Speakers
      Mountford, V and Haase, A. St George’s Eating Disorder Service, University of Bristol, UK

      Probst, M. K.U. Leuven, Department Rehabilitation Sciences and Universitair Centrum Kortenberg, and Arteveldehogeschool Opleidingseenheid Kinesitherapie Gent, Belgium.

      Wilson , T, Rutgers University, USA

      Tuschen-Caffier, B, Schüssel, C. Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Germany, and Weinbrenner, B. Christop-Dornier-Stifung Für Klinische Psychologie, Institut Siegen, Germany

      Please click here for an example of a research symposium abstract

      EXAMPLE OF A RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM

      Recent developments in Social Phobia

      Convenors: Heidenreich, T., Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II; University Clinic Johann Wolfgang Goethe and Stangier, U, Department of Psychology; University of Frankfurt, Germany

      Social Phobia, also known as social anxiety disorder, is characterized by severe impairments in both social and occupational functioning. During the last years, much progress has been made in the understanding of factors contributing to aetiology and maintenance of social phobia as well as to its treatment. Important influences have been cognitive models of the nature of excessive social anxiety. In this symposium, new approaches to both the aetiology and treatment of social phobia are included. In the first paper, Luisa Stopa investigates the role of memory perspective and self-concept in social anxiety. It is pointed out that both concepts are important and necessary to clearly understand the nature of social anxiety. The second presentation by Rachel Mycroft and Colette Hirsch presents new data on the role of valence and self-reference of images in social phobia. Among other findings, they show that negative images of the self have the most powerful effect in increasing anxiety and impairing performance. The third presentation, by Ulrich Stangier and Thomas Heidenreich deals with a topic that has been neglected for some time: The role of secondary social anxiety in mental and physical disorders. Drawing on studies in populations as diverse as alcohol dependence, eating disorders, schizophrenia and body dysmorphic disorder, the authors point out the problems in identifying clinically relevant secondary social anxiety. The following two papers are dealing with treatment studies of social phobia: Sandra Mulkens, Susan Bögels, Peter de Jong and Judith Louwers present task concentration training, a newly developed treatment for social anxiety. They report on a randomized controlled trial comparing this treatment format with exposure in vivo in patients with fear of blushing. The final paper of this symposium is presented by Finn-Magnus Borge, Asle Hoffart and Harold Sexton who report results of a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy with interpersonal therapy. The authors concentrate on the 6- and 12-month follow-up assessment points. The symposium concludes with a general discussion of future research directions in social phobia.

      Speakers:

      Luisa Stopa, University of Southampton, UK

      Rachel Mycroft and Colette Hirsch, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.

      Ulrich Stangier and Thomas Heidenreich, Frankfurt, Germany

      Sandra Mulkens, Susan Bögels, Peter de Jong and Judith Louwers, Maastricht, The Netherlands

      Finn-Magnus Borge, Asle Hoffart and Harold Sexton, Modum Bad, Norway

        Please note that for space and production reasons only the author presenting in the symposium will appear in the congress programme. However, full authorship will appear in the electronic abstract book, up to a maximum of 7 authors.

        It is expected that in most cases all speakers contributing to the symposium will deliver their presentation in person (“In-person” option). However, if one or more presenters can only attend the congress remotely, and register to attend the congress online, they can supply their talk to the convenor in the form of a pre-recorded video (please indicate any pre-recorded talks in the abstract below). Please note that there is no option for a live remote presentation, and not all symposia will be broadcast online. This means that someone supplying a pre-recorded talk may not be able to follow the symposium online. There will also be limited space in the programme to submit a fully pre-recorded symposium that will be shown to delegates in full at a scheduled time in the programme (Select the “Completely pre-recorded” option). It will be the responsibility of the convenor to coordinate the individual presentations into a single file that will be submitted to the scientific secretariat as an Mp4 file by a deadline that will be agreed if the submission is accepted. All speakers will still have to pay the registration fee to attend the congress (either as in-person or online attendees).

        Please note that if a symposium is rejected, the individual speakers will be invited to submit their individual presentations for consideration as open papers or posters. 

          3. Skills Classes

          About the format:

          Skills classes are short skills-based sessions that address a targeted problem and/or a specific technique. They are designed to be delivered to large groups in a short length of time (90 minutes) and should have a narrow focus on the acquisition of one key clinical or research skill. Delegates should come away from a skills class with the feeling that they have learned a specific concrete skill or procedure that they can directly apply in their clinical practice or research activities. Skills class submissions where the focus is not sufficiently clear or where it is felt that the presenter is attempting to cover too much material or is not sufficiently broad in scope in the 90 minutes available will risk rejection. Skills classes should be practically-oriented and experiential, including at least 50% skills practice, in line with BABCP requirements.

          Skills classes will run during the main congress programme for 90 minutes with no break. Delegates can choose to attend the skills classes at no extra cost. No fee is payable to the skills class presenters. The skills classes will be delivered live and in person and the skills class leader(s) are required to pay the registration fee for the congress.

          Submission instructions:

          Contributors will be asked to provide an abstract of maximum 500 words, structured with the following sub-headings:

          1. Primary target audience
          2. Scientific background
          3. Key learning objectives
          4. Skills class leader(s) (please provide a brief description / bio)
          5. References (2-3 key references; please also include hyperlinks where possible)

          Please click here for an example of a skills class abstract

          EXAMPLE OF SKILLS CLASS

          Assessing and treating a Specific Phobia of Vomiting

          David Veale, Instiute of Psychiatry, Kings College London

          Background: A Specific Phobia of Vomiting (SPOV) commonly develops in childhood with a mean duration of about 25 years and occurs almost exclusively in women (Veale and Lambrou, 2006; Lipsitz and Fyer, 2001). Clinicians generally regard SPOV as more difficult to treat and different in psychopathology compared to other specific phobias. People with SPOV tend to be more handicapped than people with other specific phobias (for example avoidance of a desired pregnancy or being significantly underweight from restriction of food). There is very little research in SPOV and no controlled trials in SPOV. It is however possible to use many of the advances in other disorders such as OCD and health anxiety for understanding the factors that maintain the preoccupation, distress and handicap in SPOV.  Our team provides a national service for treating SPOV and we are developing a research programme for assessing and treating SPOV. A SPOV is not a common specific phobia that presents for therapy but when it does most therapists seek help as patients may be difficult to engage. By the end of the class participants will be able to apply what they have learnt in the class to their everyday practice in treating SPOV and generalise some of the principles to other anxiety disorders.

          Learning Objectives: By the end of the class, participants will be able to:
          1. Diagnose a Specific Phobia of Vomiting (and differentiate it from an eating disorder; OCD; health anxiety; panic or social phobia).
          2. Make a developmental formulation which can be used in engagement
          3. Describe a cognitive behavioural formulation and model for treating SPOV
          4. Use new assessment measures for monitoring SPOV
          5. Use a variety of strategies from imagery rescripting, exposure in imagination and in vivo, and behavioural experiments for dropping of safety and avoidance behaviours.

          Skills Class Leader: David Veale is a Consultant Psychiatrist in CBT at the South London and Maudsley Trust and The Priory Hospital North London. He is an Honorary Senior Lecturer at the Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London. He is a Consultant at the Bethlem Royal Hospital which provides a national out-patient and residential service for people with SPOV and at the Priory Hospital North London which provides a specialist in-patient service for SPOV.  He has published about 70 peer-reviewed articles (mainly in OCD and BDD) and three self help books.

          Background readings:
          Boschen, M. J. (2007). “Reconceptualizing emetophobia: a cognitive-behavioral formulation and research agenda.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21(3): 407-19.

          Lipsitz, J. D., A. J. Fyer, et al. (2001). “Emetophobia: preliminary results of an internet survey.” Depression & Anxiety 14(2): 149-52.

          Veale, D. and C. Lambrou (2006). “The psychopathology of vomit phobia.” Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 34(2): 139-150.

          Veale, D. (in submission). Treating a specific phobia of vomiting. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist.

          4. In-Congress Half Day Workshops

          About the format:

          In-congress half day workshops will run for 3 hours, including a 30-minute coffee break, within the main congress programme. They are therefore longer than a skills class and can focus in more depth on a specific clinical or research skill, or cover a broader topic area. Workshops can have one or more leaders, and the inclusion of experts by experience is also very much encouraged.

          A separate registration fee is charged to delegates attending the in-congress half day workshop. The workshop leader(s) will receive 50% of the revenue from the workshop registration fees up to a maximum amount of £400. Workshop leaders are expected to register for the congress. If a workshop fails to reach a minimum number of 15 registrations it may be cancelled by the organisers. There is limited space in the programme for in-congress half day workshops, which means that we are likely to be able to accept only a minority of these submissions.

          Submission instructions:

          Contributors will be asked to provide an abstract of maximum 500 words, structured with the following sub-headings:

          1. Primary target audience
          2. Scientific background
          3. Key learning objectives

          1. Teaching methods
          2. Workshop leader(s) (please provide a brief description / bio)
          3. References (2-3 key references; please also include hyperlinks where possible)

          Please click here for an example of an in-congress half day workshop abstract

          EXAMPLE OF HALF DAY WORKSHOP

          Family Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.

          Susan Bögels, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

          Who the workshop is aimed at: Experience in cognitive-behavioural treatment of anxiety (in adults and/or children) is needed in order to follow this workshop.

          Background: Anxiety disorders run in families; an overlap of 60-80% has been found between parental and child anxiety disorders. Next to genetic factors, “anxiety enhancing” parenting behaviours, like modelling of anxious behaviour, overprotection, and restriction of open expression of opinions and feelings, seem to contribute to this relationship. Family CBT has been found equally effective or more effective in treating child anxiety disorders, and is potentially more cost-effective because more family members are treated at the same time. The goal of family CBT is to decrease child anxiety, parental anxiety, and anxiety-enhancing parenting.

          The goal of the family CBT that is outlined in the present workshop consists of three components:
          (i) Teaching CBT skills to the anxious child and both parents, the parents being encouraged to use these skills to guide their anxious child and to cope with their own fears (4 sessions).
          (ii) Modifying dysfunctional beliefs between parents and child that block the process of change, that is, parental beliefs about their anxious child, parenting, and the safety of their child’s world –often based on their own upbringing or anxiety-, and child’s dysfunctional beliefs about the parents and about the possibility and usefulness of communication with them (4 sessions).
          (iii) Improving communication and problem solving, between spouses about their child’s anxiety, and between all family members, including siblings (4 sessions).

          Learning Objectives: Participants will acquire the following skills:
          1) Conducting a family conversation in order to orient the family towards the treatment goals
          2) Coaching parents in guiding their anxious child (e.g. through courageous modelling)
          3) Identifying and challenging dysfunctional parental cognitions about the anxiety of their child and their role as a parent
          4) Conducting a family discussion on a “hot issue”

          Teaching Methods: In this workshop the three components of the treatment will be taught through instruction, modelling, and practice (role-plays).

          Workshop Leader: Susan Bögels (clinical psychologist/psychotherapist) works as a researcher and practitioner in the area of child and parental anxiety disorders. One of her major themes of interest is how parents of anxious children influence the anxiety of their child through their own dysfunctional beliefs, their own upbringing, and the interaction between parental and child anxiety. She is currently conducting a Randomised Clinical Trial in 8 centers of child psychiatry in Holland, to compare the effects of family CBT with child CBT for children and adolescents with clinical anxiety disorders.

          Background Readings:
          1. Barrett, P. M., Dadds, M. R., and Rapee, R. M. (1996). Family treatment of childhood anxiety: a controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 333-342.

          2. Ginsburg, G. S., Silverman, W. K., and Kurtines, W. K. (1995). Family involvement in treating children with phobic and anxiety disorders: A look ahead. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 457-473.

          3. Siqueland, L., and Diamond, G. S. (1998). Engaging parents in cognitive behavioral treatment for children with anxiety disorders. Cognitive and behavioural practice, 5, 81-102.

            5. Panel Discussion

            About the format:

            Panel discussions involve experts in their fields providing a brief statement of their position on a specific clinical or theoretical issue or topic, and then debate differences in opinion, controversial issues etc. with other experts. At their best, a panel discussion provides the opportunity to stimulate lively discussion that will go beyond the room and continue amongst delegates not only at the congress but long afterwards.

            This requires an active chair who may act as an optional discussant, introduces the topic, organises position statements, handles the discussion amongst the experts, fields questions from the audience and is responsible for time management of the session. The inclusion of experts by experience is also very much encouraged.

            Panel discussions can contain a maximum of 4-5 people (maximum 5) to include an optional discussant (if providing a summary). Please note that each presenter should present a verbal statement (no use of PowerPoint/visual aids etc.) of position for maximum 10 minutes, which typically will not require presentation of data.

            Panel discussions will be scheduled for 90 minute sessions. The panel discussions will be delivered live and in person and all panel members are required to pay the registration fee for the congress

            Submission instructions:

            The abstract should be a maximum of 500 words, and include the names of at least 3 speakers.

            Please click here for an example of a panel discussion abstract

            EXAMPLE OF A PANEL DISCUSSION

            Common Language In Psychotherapy (CLiP) Project

            Chair: Mehmet Sungur, Medical School of Marmara University, Dept of Psychiatry, Istanbul, Turkey

            One of the main requirements for the evolution of psychotherapy from art into a science is to establish a common psychotherapy language. At present, similar procedures are given different names by different schools or the same label (name) may denote different procedures in different hands. The EABCT and AABT have recognized the need to reduce this confusion by appointing a joint task force to work on a project towards a common psychotherapy language. Panel members will outline the project. It aims to evolve a dictionary of psychotherapy procedures of therapists from different schools, with the hope of encouraging shared use of the same terms for given procedures. A common language might reduce confusion and facilitate scientific advance in the field. The project will use plain language. It will not lead to an encyclopaedia or textbook or theoretical exposition of psychotherapies. The dictionary will concisely describe terms for a comprehensive set of psychotherapy procedures in simple language as free from theoretical assumptions as possible, each with a brief case example (up to 450 words), note of its first known use, and 1-2 references. The terms will try to describe what therapists do, not why they do it (the latter too is important and could be the subject of a separate project). Regular updates of the Dictionary will be aimed at via the CLiP website that should operate shortly.  Submissions will be invited of 1st-draft entries of terms to the clip task force. The Panel will describe the project’s significance and hoped-for outcome, give examples of completed entries and their authors, and how to make 1st-draft submissions and the iterative process toward their completion. Most of the Panel’s 1.5 hours is expected to be taken up by audience feedback to help shape the project even further.

              6. Clinical Roundtable

              About the format:

              Clinical roundtables involves a clinical case discussion by experts illustrating contrasting viewpoints and analysis of the clinical problem under discussion. Presenters should present an anonymised case, focusing on specific topics. One person is required to present the case and up to 4 people can comment on the case. This provides a particularly valuable opportunity to compare and contrast how different kinds of CBT might approach the same problem.

              Clinical roundtables will be scheduled for 90 minute sessions. In a typical clinical roundtable, a clinical case might be presented for approximately 15 minutes and each expert would subsequently provide their opinions between 5-10 minutes. The remaining would then be for debate and taking questions from the audience. However, the structure is flexible and alternative proposals will be considered, as long as the overall time constraint is strictly managed.

              A clinical roundtable requires a chair, who may act as an optional discussant, to introduce the topic, handle comments from the other participants and field questions from the audience.

              Submission instructions:

              The abstract should be maximum 500 words and include the names of at least 3 speakers.

              The clinical roundtables will be delivered live and in person, and all panel members are required to pay the registration fee for the congress

                7. Open Papers

                About the format:

                An ‘Open Paper’ is a presentation on a clinical and/or research topic with a typical time allocation of 15-20 minutes. Open papers that are accepted will be grouped together by the Scientific Committee to form symposia of 90 minutes. An open paper may therefore be a suitable format for someone who wishes to give a talk in a symposium, but is not part of a submitted symposium and does not wish to convene a whole symposium themselves. Open papers can be submitted by anyone at any stage of their clinical or research career, and submissions from experts by experience are also very much encouraged. Open papers are a very popular format with limited space and can therefore be very competitive. However, submissions that cannot be accepted as open papers due to limited capacity will automatically be considered for potential acceptance as posters or a 3 minute talk (3MT; see below).

                Submission instructions:

                Open papers require an abstract up to a maximum of 500 words. We strongly suggest a structured abstract using the following sections (although we realise this is not always appropriate):

                   1. Introduction
                2. Method
                3. Results
                4. Discussion

                If the open paper includes a study for which there is information publicly available such as published paper, pre-registration or protocol it can be very helpful to include one key reference and a link in the abstract to help demonstrate the quality of the submission and to help congress delegates find further information.

                Please note that for space and production reasons only authors presenting the open paper will appear in the congress programme. However, full authorship will appear in the electronic abstract book up to a maximum of 7 authors.

                Please click here for an example of a open paper abstract

                EXAMPLES OF OPEN PAPERS

                a) Neuroimaging and CBT in anxiety disorders

                Prasko, J., Horacek, J, Paskova, B. Prague Psychiatric Centre; 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University and Centre of Neuropsychiatric Studies, Prague, Czech Republic Praskova, H., Out-patients Psychiatric Clinic, Horni Palata, Prague, Czech Republic

                Neuroimaging studies on anxiety disorders is at relatively preliminary stage. Nevertheless, findings are arguably consistent with involvement of limbic, paralimbic, and prefrontal regions. In studies with positron emission tomography (PET) patients suffering with GAD have increased relative metabolic rates in the right posterior temporal lobe, right precentral frontal gyrus, and left inferior area 17 in the occipital lobe but reduced absolute basal ganglia rates (Wu et al. 1991). Imaging studies that have pooled or compared findings across different anxiety disorders may also shed light on the underlying neuroanatomy of anxiety symptoms that are not disorder specific. An analysis of pooled PET symptom provocation data from patients with OCD, PTSD, and specific fobia, for example, reported activation of paralimbic structures (right posterior medial orbitofrontal cortex, bilateral insular cortex), right inferior frontal cortex, bilaterl lenticulate nuclei , and bilaterl brain-stem foci (Rauch et al. 1997). There is growing realization of the importance of various CSTC loops in a range of behavioral disorders (cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuit), particularly in relation to certain kinds of cognitive affective cues, and appear most relevant in OCD. Functional imaging studies provide some of the most persuasive evidence of the role of CSTC circuits in OCD. Patients have increased activity in the orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and basal ganglia (Rauch and Baxter 1998). Additionally, question remain about precise nature of CSTC dysfunction in OCD and its normalization by effective treatment. Decreased orbitofrontal activity in OCD predicts positive response to pharmacotherapy, whereas higher orbitofrontal activity predicts positive response to behavioral therapy (Brody et al. 1998). Preliminary evidence from brain imaging shows the importance of amygdala and paralimbic structures in panic disorder. CT study suggested prefrontal abnormalities (Wurthmann et al. 1998), a SPECT study showing asymmetry of inferior frontal cortical perfussion (De Cristofaro et al. 1993). Although it has been hypothesized that cognitive-behavioral therapy exert effects in panic disorder by behavioral desensitization of hyppocampal-mediated contextual conditioning, or by cognitive techniques tha strengthen medial prefrontal cortex inhibition of amigdala (Gorman et al. 2000), the relevant empirical studies have not yet been undertaken. We will present preliminary PET data of 12 patients with panic disorder. Patient were measured before and after therapy with antidepressant or CBT. The finding will be discussed, compared with results of other studies and showed with accordance of neurobiological theories.

                b) Relationships between schemas (Young’s model) and the bis/bas individual differences (Gray’s model).

                Cid, J, Servei de Rehabilitació. Parc Hospitalari Marti i Julià. I.A.S. Girona ; Torrubia, R, Unitat de Psicología Mèdica. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona.

                Schemas have a central role in cognitive psychopathology. In fact, a cognitive model assumes that schemas are developed in response to biological predispositions and environmental influences. However, little is known in terms of empirical data with regard to how they are related to biological or temperamental variables. Furthermore, the cognitive-behavioural case conceptualization has not usually taken into account the influence of temperamental variables. Nowadays, there are several approaches both to the study of schemas (e.g. Beck et al., 1990; Arntz, 1999; Young, 1990) and to the study of biological or temperamental bases of personality (e.g. Gray, 1988; Cloninger, 1986, 1987). The theoretical frameworks of our research were the schema-focused model (Young, 1990) and Gray’s personality model. The first defines schemas (Early Maladaptive Schemas, EMS) as “broad, pervasive themes regarding oneself and one’s relationship with others, developed during childhood and elaborated throughout one’s lifetime and dysfunctional to a significant degree” (Young, 1994). Gray’s model of personality, includes two neuropsychological systems, the Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) and the Behavioural Activation System (BAS) which underlie the personality dimensions of anxiety and impulsivity, respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric relationships between schemas and the individual differences in the activity of BIS and BAS. A total of 115 psychiatric patients from a Catalonian Mental Health Centre were included in the study. To evaluate schemas, we used the Spanish Version of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Cid, Tejero and Torrubia, 1999; Cid and Torrubia, 2001); this is a 205-item self-report that assesses 16 early maladaptive schemas. To evaluate individual differences in BIS/BAS, we administered the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ, Torrubia, Avila, Moltó, and Caseras; 2001). Statistical analyses consisted of a Principal component analysis with Varimax rotation including schema and personality scales, and a multiple regression analysis using the Sensitivity to punishment (SP) and Sensitivity to reward (SR) scales as independent variables, and each schema as a dependent variable. Principal component analysis yielded three factors with eigen values higher than 1 which accounted for 69.19 % of variance. The first was loaded by SP and the schema scales Failure, Social Undesirability, Dependence, Defectiveness, Social Isolation, Insufficient Self-control and Subjugation, the second by the schema scales Self-sacrifice, Unrelenting standards, Emotional deprivation, Mistrust, Emotional inhibition, Abandonment and Vulnerability to harm and illness, and the third by SR and the schema scales Enmeshment and Entitlement. Results from multiple regression analyses showed that SP and SR scales accounted for a significant percentage of variance in all of the schemas. In the discussion, we develop the implications of these results for the assessment, case conceptualization, and cognitive-behavioural treatment of personality disorders.

                Additionally, please note that an open paper presenter may be limited to only presenting one open paper in the programme (they can of course present other material in an accepted symposium as well as other formats, e.g. posters.)

                All open paper presentations will be delivered live and in person, and all presenters are required to pay the registration fee for the congress

                  8. Three Minute Talks (3MTs)

                  About the format:

                  A Three Minute Talk (3MT) is a brief version of the ‘Open Paper’ format as described above. All 3MTs will be placed together into open paper slots, and each speaker will have 3 minutes to present their research, service development, or clinical practice topic, leading to particularly stimulating sessions.

                  Many standard talk topics could be presented as a 3MT, but the format might also be particularly suitable for presenting new ideas or case presentations that might not yet be ready or suitable for a full-length presentation slot. 3MTs that are not accepted in this format will automatically be considered for a poster.

                  Submission instructions:

                  3MTs require an abstract up to a maximum of 500 words. We strongly suggest a structured abstract using the following sections (although we realise this is not always appropriate):

                      1. Introduction
                  2. Method
                  3. Results
                  4. Discussion

                  If the 3MT includes a study for which there is information publicly available such as published paper, pre-registration or protocol it can be very helpful to include one key reference and a link in the abstract to help demonstrate the quality of the submission and to help congress delegates find further information.

                  Please note that for space and production reasons only authors presenting the 3MT will appear in the congress programme. However, full authorship will appear in the electronic abstract book up to a maximum of 7 authors.

                  All 3MT presentations will be delivered live and in person, and all presenters are required to pay the registration fee for the congress

                    9. Posters

                    About the format:

                    Posters are visual presentations of research studies or clinical cases, and will be displayed during themed poster sessions scheduled throughout the congress. The presenter is encouraged to stand by their poster and be available for discussion during the refreshment breaks while their poster is on display. Poster displays are arranged and scheduled so that they can be attended by everyone at the congress, providing an opportunity to present research or a clinical case to the widest possible audience. For this reason, this presentation format provides the greatest opportunity for in-depth discussion; delegates, often including experts in the area, will often seek out the posters falling in their area of interest precisely because they offer the chance to meet the presenter and discuss the work in detail. The visual presentation format of the posters also offers many opportunities for innovation, for example via the inclusion of QR codes or links to additional information, videos, or more, and wide dissemination via sharing on e.g. social media. Posters are popular with presenters across the whole range of experience including students and early-career researchers or clinicians, experts by experience, and recognised leaders in a particular field. In addition to completed research studies or clinical cases we will also consider posters reporting on studies currently in progress or study protocols. Posters will also be displayed online within the online congress platform. This means that if you are attending the congress online only it is possible to submit an electronic poster for online display.

                    Submission instructions:

                    Posters require an abstract up to a maximum of 500 words. For research posters we strongly suggest a structured abstract using the following sections (although we realise this is not always appropriate):
                        1. Introduction
                    2. Method
                    3. Results
                    4. Discussion

                    For case report posters we suggest the following sections:
                        1. Presenting Problem
                    2. Case Conceptualisation and Intervention
                    3. Outcome
                    4. Review and Evaluation

                    Clear reference must be made to the relevant underpinning empirical and theoretical bases and include all four sections. If the poster includes a study for which there is information publically available such as published paper, pre-registration or protocol it can be very helpful to include one key reference and a link in the abstract to help demonstrate the quality of the submission and to help congress delegates find further information.

                    Please click here for an example of poster abstracts

                    EXAMPLES OF POSTERS

                    a) Black women’s’ phenomenological experience of providing home-care for a family member with AIDS in a third world context

                    Basson, P.J. and Whelan, M. Rand Afrikaans University

                    World statistics show that HIV infection is on the increase. Much attention is thus currently paid to the prevention of AIDS. A growing problem, however, is the increasing number of people in the terminal phase of HIV – especially in developing countries like South Africa. During this phase of the illness serious infections manifest themselves and there is a general decline in the patient’s functioning, leading to increased dependence on others for activities of daily living. Often these people in the final phase of HIV are accommodated in hospitals and hospices. Due to rising health care costs, inadequate and understaffed facilities and overwhelmed health care workers, more and more people in the final phase of HIV are cared for at home. In most developing and third world countries home-based care becomes the responsibility of illiterate, uneducated family members of infected individuals, with little or no resources to provide terminal care. For this reason a phenomenological study was conducted in order to expose the experience of providing care for a family member in the final phase of HIV. Five black female care givers were included in this study. Common themes that emerged from the transcribed interviews included the establishment of an existential baseline as well as diminished independence and freedom of participants. They also expressed the need for support (emotional, financial and medical). Lastly religion and certain coping mechanisms were found to either facilitate or hinder the provision of care, depending on their rigidity and effectiveness respectively.

                    b) The relationship between delusional ideations and stress coping in Japanese college students.

                    Syudo Yamasaki, Hiromi Arakawa, Yoshihiko Tanno, Graduate school of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo

                    Introduction : Delusional ideation is one of the symptoms in schizophrenia. In many recent studies, delusional ideation in general population has been investigated. These studies found that there were more people with delusional ideation in general population than that had been expected. However, there were a few studies about the relationship between delusional ideation and stress coping style in healthy samples. Schuldberg et al. (1996) found that psychosis-prone individuals used more coping by Escape-avoidance and Accepting responsibility. In the present study, we tried to examine the relationship between delusional ideation and stress coping style in Japanese college students. Method: The Japanese version of Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI; Yamasaki et al. 2004) and Lazarus Type Stress Coping Inventory (SCI; Lazarus and Folkman, 1984; Motoaki et al. 1991) were administered to 154 college students (106 men and 48 women with mean age±SD of 19.2 ± 0.9). The Japanese version of PDI was consisted of 40 items, which was including assessing measures of presence of ideation, distress, preoccupation and conviction for each item. PDI has four dimensions of delusional ideation. SCI has eight subscales of stress coping (Planful problem solving, Confrontive Coping, Seeking Social Support, Accepting Responsibility, Self-controlling, Escape-avoidance, Distancing, Positive Reappraisal). Results: Correlation coefficients between four dimensions of PDI and eight subscales of SCI were examined. Distress of delusional ideation has positive correlations with escape-avoidance coping (r = 0.23, p < 0.01), Accepting responsibility (r = 0.19, p < 0.05) and Seeking Social Support (r = 0.20, p < 0.05). Distress of delusional ideations has negative correlations with Self-controlling (r = – 0.18, p < 0.05), Positive Reappraisal (r = – 0.20, p < 0.05) and Planful problem solving (r = – 0.20, p < 0.05). The number of presence of delusional ideations was positively correlated with Accepting responsibility (r = 0.22, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In the present study, the result of Schlberg et al. could be replicated in college students. Escape-avoidance and Accepting responsibility coping has positive correlations to distress of delusional ideations. On the other hand, Self-controlling, Positive Reappraisal and Planful problem solving has negative correlations to distress of delusional ideations. Patients with schizophrenia tend to use passive and avoiding coping strategies in stressful situations rather than problem solving coping (Gispen-de Wied, 2000). The result of present study also suggested that delusion-prone college students had the same pattern of coping strategy as the previous studies.

                    c) Expressed Emotion and Parasuicide

                    Santos, J.C.P., Bissaya Barreto Nursing School, Portugal, Saravia, C.B., Coimbra University, Portugal, and Sousa, L., Oporto University, Portugal.

                    Parasuicidal and suicidal behaviour are increasing a lot in some Western countries and are considered a public health problem. Parasuicide occurs mainly in the age group between 15 to 24 years old and therefore it is a priority to study this population group. Expressed Emotion is not a concept that has been studied in these behaviours, although it has been used in other pathologies over the last 30 years. Expressed Emotion is assessed through a semi-structured interview using five scales: hostility, over-involvement, critical comments, warmth and positive comments. This is a prospective study carried out over nine months. The results presented here refer to the first contact, the first week after the Parasuicide behaviour, and research is still in progress. The sample consisted of relatives of 35 individuals (aged between 15 to 24, who committed parasuicidal behaviour), residents in the city of Coimbra and its surrounding areas (in the central region of Portugal). Our first contact was made in the Accident and Emergency Department (from 15 th September 2003 to 31 st March 2004), with people whose cause of admission was parasuicidal behaviour. After this we carried out interviews with the family, in the first week after the parasuicidal behaviour. We used the Camberwell Family Interview (Leff, J and Vaughn, C, 1985) for the interviews which were taped and analysed after. The general aim is to characterise the Expressed Emotion of the family members of those individuals who have parasuicidal behaviour. The sample of 35 parasuicidal individuals was predominantly female with an average age of 19 and who were mainly students. Almost all were single (91,4%). The vast majority of the sample (88,5%) had parasuicidal behaviour involving drug overdose and for the majority (57,2%) this was their first attempt. Out of a total of 57 interviews carried out with relatives and other important people in the lives of the parasuicidal individuals, 31 showed a high EE and 26 a low EE and we classified 26 families with high EE. The interviews lasted on average 50 minutes with a minimum of 30 minutes and a maximum of 90 minutes. We found evidence of high emotional over-involvement in 23 of the situations studied. There was a high level of criticism in 19 with hostility also present in 7 interviews. Some of them had high levels in more than one of the scales. The presence in the results of high levels of EE, particularly emotional over-involvement did not confirm the data obtained by Pollard (1996) who found a higher presence of criticism and hostility rather than emotional over-involvement. We can characterise the behaviour of over-involvement mainly through excessive self-sacrifice and statements of attitude. Critical comments were present suggestion situations involving traits and states according to the cases. The situation that we found has not permitted us, yet to draw generalised conclusions with regards to the stability or development of the critical comments and EE. With regards to hostility, the majority of the situations can be characterised by the presence of generalised criticism and rejecting remarks together. Leff (1989) says that in general the study of EE in any situation requires us: to study the relationship between EE and pathology; to draw up an adequate intervention plan and finally to analyse the appropriateness of the intervention model in a clinical context. In the case of parasuicidal behaviour the assessment of our EE research carried out shows the presence of a high EE mainly through over-involvement which we would like to highlight. We also found high levels of criticism. The research will continue to characterise better the relationship between parasuicidal behaviour and EE.

                    Technical information on how to prepare your poster will be provided with notification of acceptance. Please indicate below whether you plan to attend to present your poster in person (in which case it will also be displayed online), or whether you are submitting an e-poster for online display only.

                    Please note that for space and production reasons only the first three authors will appear in the congress programme. However, full authorship will appear in the abstract book up to a maximum of 7 authors. If there are more than 7 authors then please acknowledge this within your poster.

                    All identifying individual details in a case report poster must be removed or altered so as to maintain anonymity.

                      10. Technical demonstrations

                      These are 20-30 minute short demonstrations that present specific technology or equipment and its application to CBT. Technical demonstrations can include the presentation of both hardware and software, as well as research and clinical data, in a flexible yet focused manner.

                      The abstract should include a clear description of the relevant technology and its relevance to the application of CBT.

                      Contributors should provide a structured abstract of up to 500 words including the following subsections:

                      • Technical / Scientific background
                      • Key features of the technology presented
                      • Implications for everyday clinical practice of CBT

                      Delegates can attend the technical demonstration at no extra cost therefore no fee is payable.

                      The topics for technical demonstrations can be: software demonstrations, virtual reality (VR), telehealth platforms, biofeedback and wearable technology, AI and machine learning applications, e-health and mobile applications and gamification in therapy.